<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ReligionLink &#187; Security &amp; civil liberty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.religionlink.com/category/government-politics/international/security-civil-liberty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.religionlink.com</link>
	<description>Ideas and resources for every journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Religion and violence after Sept. 11: Divining the connections</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_110830a.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_110830a.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine & practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sept. 11, 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion and violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=8498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sept. 11 terror attacks seemed to confirm suspicions of some that there is an inherent connection between religion and violence. The 9/11 plotters cited Islam as their inspiration – case closed. But that explanation was considered too simple then, and 10 years later the debate on this controversial topic continues.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_110830a.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osama bin Laden killed: Assessing the aftermath</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_110502.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_110502.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 04:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=7555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News that U.S. troops have killed Osama bin Laden, leader of Al Qaeda and mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, is a stunning development that is bound to spark a range of reactions — jubilation for many, anger for others, and for some believers, a debate over whether this was the moral and ethical course of action.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_110502.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghan turmoil: War and peace &#8230; and faith</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_100706.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_100706.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McChrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=5863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama's decision to replace the leader of allied forces in Afghanistan has led to renewed questions on the U.S. strategy there -- and on whether the war is morally and militarily justified.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_100706.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslims and civil rights: A continuing debate</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090630.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090630.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine & practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September 11]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=2042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama&#8217;s June 4 address to the Muslim world served as a fresh reminder of the tensions between civil rights and national security that have played out in the U.S. and abroad since 9/11. The president&#8217;s speech was welcomed by the Muslim community, which remains deeply concerned about attacks against Muslims. In the wake [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090630.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tortured debate: the morality of prisoner abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090512.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090512.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eMinders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is torture ever justified? The answer is clear to American believers &#8211; but for some that answer is clearly &#8220;yes,&#8221; for others it is definitely &#8220;no.&#8221; And that stark moral divide is shaping a debate that is growing more intense even years after the first revelations of prisoner abuse. The arguments are fueled in part [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090512.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Islamofascism: Anatomy of an epithet</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090503.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090503.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religions & movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamofascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=2099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islamofascism has emerged into the national conversation with increasing frequency and prominence since the Sept. 11 attacks. Supporters of the term claim they are using it to describe a dangerous form of radicalism. But critics say the word is offensive and ill-considered &#8212; a poorly conceived shortcut to describe a mix of Islam and politics. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_090503.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion and human rights: China and the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/guide_china.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/guide_china.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion in American life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports & games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprl.debralmason.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world’s eyes will turn to China when it hosts the XXIX Olympic Games Aug. 8-24 in Beijing. For many, eyes are already on the ascendant Asian economic powerhouse. Tensions and issues involving China are making headlines daily. Riots in the Buddhist region of Tibet, dissenters on trial in China, allegations of terrorism by China’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/guide_china.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The torture debate: Religious opposition two years after Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_060417.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_060417.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security & civil liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wprl.debralmason.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED OCT. 15, 2007 Torture remains a front-burner issue almost four years after the first images of American troops abusing Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib shocked Americans into debate over the ethics of torture. The debate continues to gain force, led by a widening array of religious voices. The debate is complex. On one hand, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_060417.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

