<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ReligionLink &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.religionlink.com/category/government-politics/law/supreme-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.religionlink.com</link>
	<description>Ideas and resources for every journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Election 2010 roundup: Politics and religion</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_101103.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_101103.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church & state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty and welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=6674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2010 midterm congressional elections promised to reshape the political landscape, and they did just that, as Republicans swept to victory in the House while cutting deeply into the Democratic majority in the Senate. But the vote also recast the terrain on moral and social issues important to believers of all political persuasions.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_101103.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court hears arguments in Establishment case</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_09100.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_09100.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church & state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=3421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Religion was at the forefront as the U.S. Supreme Court began its new term this week. Justices heard arguments and seemed&#160;divided Wednesday over whether a cross in a national preserve violates the First Amendment&#8217;s Establishment Clause. The cross, which honors World War I soldiers, was first erected&#160;&#8211; without permission &#8212; in California&#8217;s Mojave Desert in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/topic_09100.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion doctor killed: Issue takes center stage</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090531.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090531.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion & birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine & practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=1751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The killing of a Kansas abortion doctor has thrust the issue of abortion rights and abortion violence into the headlines again. George Tiller was shot to death Sunday, May 31, 2009, while serving as an usher at his Lutheran church in Wichita. A 51-year-old suspect, Scott Roeder, was apprehended later that day, and the story [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/eminder_090531.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court upholds ‘partial-birth abortion’ ban</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_061030.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_061030.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion & birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED APR. 18, 2007: The United States Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Wednesday (April 18, 2007) that the federal law banning the so-called “partial-birth abortion” procedure does not violate a woman’s right to an abortion. The ruling was considered a victory for abortion opponents. The procedure, usually carried out in the second or third trimester of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_061030.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea case could cause religious liberty tempest</title>
		<link>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_051031b.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_051031b.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionlink.com/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED FEB. 21, 2006: On Tuesday the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a small religious group that combines Christianity and Native American practices can use hallucinogenic tea in its ceremonies. The core of the case – what happens to the First Amendment right to freely exercise religion when it conflicts with federal law – [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.religionlink.com/tip_051031b.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

